Alicia and I went to the Kerry/Edwards rally in Des Moines last night and had a really great time, considering. The “considering” part, by the by, had nothing to do with the company and an awful lot to do with other situational elements. For starters, the rally was (of course) outside. I am verrah grateful to Alicia for talking me into bringing a coat, because it was ~cold~ outside. And then there was the chronometric* problem. We arrived at the fairgrounds around 5:15 and got back to the car around 10:30. We were standing, outside in the cold, that entire time. I had parts go numb I didn’t even know I had until their absence rendered them conspicuous. And the most annoying part? Kerry and Edwards didn’t even take the stage until almost 10. Prior to their appearance, we had music, music, other politicians, music, and even a musical intermission to the music.

Despite the cold and the standing and the music (my God, the music), we left happy. It was a fun time. I got to shiver within fifty yards of people like Josh Hartnett and Hal Ketchum, and within a few feet of local politicians like Senator Harkin and Governor Vilsack. We were also briefly within lunging distance (I’d say six feet) of John Kerry, John Edwards, and their respective wives, Teresa and Elizabeth. If the Johns end up in the White House, I’ll be able to say I’ve stood within a few feet of them. I’ll probably leave out the lunging part.

It was also cool to feel the emotion of the crowd. Ever since the VEISHEA riots earlier this year, I’ve considered crowds (mobs, whatever) to be an organic being, comprised of individuals, but ultimately a singular whole capable of acting and feeling as one. During the riot, those feelings were of camaraderie, but also of tension, anger, and expectation; we had an enemy, and it was us against them. The rally was, thankfully, different. We still had an ‘enemy’ of sorts, of course, but that enemy was not present and was therefore more an idea than anything else. As such, camaraderie and single-purposedness (not in the negative sense) were the overwhelming emotions. I felt I was surrounded by 15,000 friends, and was not afraid to smile and speak to the people next to me.


Oh, and they were really pushing people to push people to vote, so… vote! I was impressed they didn’t tell us ~who~ to get people to vote for (maybe that was implied…), but I wouldn’t have told you anyways. You’ve minds… make ‘em. I think voter turnout is going to be surprisingly high this election, which is a cool thing.

Linkage

Unregistered: DelcareYourself. That’s where I registered a few months ago. It’s pretty easy to do, though you still have to print something out and mail it. I have an absentee ballot sitting next to my computer, since I have class all day the 2nd.

Interesting: Video comparing President Bush’s eloquence ten years ago to what passes for it today. I have this linked in my miniblog, but I’ve the feeling most of you don’t read that.

Bipartisan: Flash movie equally insulting (and hilarious) to both parties. It’s awesome. And NSFCW (Not Safe For Conservative Workplaces).


* I had this word in my book review, and Quinn made me take it out. Since then, I’ve been jonesing to use it. Huzzah!

Posted Friday, October 15th, 2004 at 11:57 am
Filed Under Category: uncategorized
Both comments and pings are currently closed.

7

Responses to “Baby’s first politically-related post.”

Eric

Vote Libertarian. ;p

The John’s run us even more broke and Bush is set to start trouble in Iran.

Vote Third party! Damn the Electoral system!

Rob

I’ll vote Libertarian the second a Libertarian candidate has a snowball’s chance in hell of winning. It isn’t this year. I wouldn’t be surprised to see it happen within the next three elections, though.

And on a related note, I’ll also vote for the first candidate to quote that alien dude off the Simpsons. I don’t remember exactly how it goes, but it’s something like, “We must move forwards, not backwards; upwards, not downwards; and always twirling, TWIRLING towards freedom!”

Amanda

You know, Rob, it’s people like you (scary, I know) who are the reason a Libertarian candidate will never get a substantial amount of the vote. Jerkface. :)

Mris

As someone who started voting Libertarian 8 years ago the minute it was legal, I think a lot of people misunderstand the reasonable motivation for voting for a third-party candidate. It’s not to back a winning horse. It’s to indicate an agreement with an underrepresented point of view and/or a dissatisfaction with the choices. If you don’t vote at all, no one can tell whether you’re dissatisfied with the choices (and in which direction) or whether you just couldn’t be bothered to haul your butt out to vote. A third-party vote is a protest vote, and an attempt to get enough votes to get the candidates a bigger/better opportunity to speak next time. None of it guarantees that anyone will listen, but it’s an attempt at exercising free speech more than an attempt at actually electing a candidate on the national level.

That said, I’m not voting Libertarian this year for President. Sure, the Johns will run us more broke: they are tax-and-spend Democrats. But Bush is a spend-and-spend Republican as well as being a rabid warmonger and…yeah, I’ll just stop it there. I never voted for the lesser of two evils before, on the theory that I didn’t want evil for President. I find that I distinctly prefer one evil to the other this time.

My other big problems with the Libertarian Party are that they can’t figure out how to market themselves for sour owl crap, and that they are much better at talking about how they want things to be than about how we should get there, concretely, in the real world, where we aren’t starting with a blank slate.

Eric

lol, Jerkface. Classic.

Voting Libertarian for the following reasons:

1) It’s the best fit to my ideaology from all the angles (though not perfect, close enough).
2) In protest of the two-party system
3) In protest of the electoral system
4) In protest of the bi-partisan institution that is the “non-partisan” Committee on Presidential Debates.
5) 1984 — It’ll happen if we continue to live under the rule of either Bush or Kerry.
6) Democratic-Republican will become one party (and we’ll all be screwed) if there’s not a stronger popular base for third-parties.

Quinn

I *still* don’t know what chronometric means.

Here’s a link to the Atlantic Monthly article that talks about Bush ten years ago vs. Bush today. It’s excellent reading:

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200407/fallows

I need to go back and read it again to see how much of it proved to be true during the debates.